Cage Free Broiler Raising – Is Cage Free Better For Hens?

There are many benefits of cage free broiler raising, but there are also some drawbacks. Here are some things to consider: Animal welfare, Taste, Cost, and Health. Cage free raising is better for hens, but there are trade-offs. You’ll need to consider these factors and weigh the benefits and drawbacks carefully.

Animal welfare

Cage-free systems are gaining popularity for their benefits to animals’ welfare. While battery cages are still the industry norm, more than 2,000 companies and 27 powerhouses have made commitments to cage-free systems. A recent report by the OWA, or Organization for World Animal Welfare, emphasized the importance of cage-free systems.

Animal welfare is a value-based concept that draws on animal physiology and ethology. It must be socially robust and constantly interrogates what is not acceptable for animals. In 1965, the Brambell Committee introduced the Five Freedoms framework for animal welfare, which has become government policy in many countries. More recent animal welfare frameworks also consider positive emotional states and animals’ needs to express natural behaviors.

Cage-free systems provide space for hens to exercise, spread their wings, and lay eggs. But cage-free systems do not necessarily provide access to the outdoors. In addition to providing more space, these systems also encourage the birds to participate in natural behaviors like perching and dust bathing.

Animal welfare advocates have pushed for cage-free policies for hens. The movement is growing and gaining momentum in many countries outside the United States. For example, the Humane League has launched a program called the “Open Wing Alliance” that provides grants to animal welfare organizations in developing countries. However, despite the momentum, hundreds of millions of hens remain in cages.

Since the passage of the California law, many large food companies and retailers began sourcing their eggs from companies that provide cage-free housing. This gave animal welfare advocates the momentum to pass similar laws in other states. This shift is a positive development for animal welfare and is particularly important in times of rising prices for conventional eggs.


Using cage-free eggs is a great way to help save animals, but it can be a costly process. Many major food companies have delayed making the transition to cage-free eggs. McDonald’s delayed its plans to use cage-free eggs until 2025, citing the difficulty in making this transition. Companies must purchase new equipment and facilities, and this can cost as much as double the cost of a traditional farm.

Egg companies have invested hundreds of millions of dollars in building cage-free barns and converting old ones. However, the price of cage-free eggs has decreased significantly in the past few years. While cage-free eggs cost nearly 11 cents more than conventional eggs in late 2016, they are just 4 cents more expensive today. This drop is likely due to a combination of increased supply and state laws. Many big companies have also demanded cage-free eggs from their suppliers.

The California law requires all eggs sold in the state to be cage-free. As a result, the price of eggs from California will go up by 65%. This means that consumers will pay an average of $5.12 per dozen when using the cage-free method. In comparison, conventional eggs cost just nine cents per egg.

While there is a cost associated with using cage-free eggs, it is likely that the price of cage-free eggs will eventually become comparable to those produced by conventional hens. In addition to their higher labor costs, cage-free egg farms will also produce fewer eggs. In addition to the increased labor costs, these factors will make cage-free eggs less attractive to many consumers. In fact, one of the biggest egg producers in the country reported a 57% drop in net sales last year.

Because the costs of raising cage-free chickens will continue to rise, companies will need to increase their prices to justify the cost. Some companies will be able to pass the costs on to consumers. And many consumers are becoming aware of the animal welfare problems caused by cage-free hens, which is why they are going cage-free.


Free-range eggs have many health benefits, including better overall nutritional profiles. They have lower levels of saturated fat, cholesterol, and cholesterol-lowering trans fats, and they are richer in vitamins and minerals, especially omega 3s. Free-range eggs also contain higher levels of beta carotene and alpha tocopherol, which is a powerful antioxidant.

In a study, the European Food Safety Authority analyzed data from 3,000 farms across the EU. They found that caged systems were five times more likely to harbor salmonella, an organism that can cause severe illness. Cage-free environments are more sanitary and easier to disinfect. In addition, hens laying eggs in cage-free environments acquire healthy gut flora, reducing their risk of contracting diseases. Moreover, eggs produced by cage-free farms are also less likely to contain contaminants such as dioxin-like materials, chemical residues, and insect infestation.

One of the greatest advantages of cage-free eggs is the lower price. Cage-free eggs cost about one-third less than their conventional counterparts. These savings help to reduce the number of caged hens and help to preserve the environment. Consumers should be aware of these benefits and look for ways to support cage-free egg production.


The term “cage free” is a marketing trick to promote the product. It doesn’t actually mean that the chickens are free to roam and peck each other. Instead, cages were invented as a way to contain this behavior and keep chickens in smaller, more manageable environments. And while this is better for us, it is not the best for the chickens.


There are a number of advantages to buying cage free food. For instance, consumers can rest assured that the eggs were not raised in cages. However, the availability of cage free food may be difficult to achieve due to the costs involved. Fortunately, a growing number of companies are making commitments to cage-free egg production.

Many grocery stores are already adopting the practice of selling only cage-free eggs. However, restaurants are not required to make their meals using cage-free eggs. In addition, consumers are unable to make a choice among cage-free and conventional eggs, as the price is fixed. In contrast, grocery stores offer various prices for eggs, allowing consumers to make a conscious choice.

Because of the ethical benefits of eating cage-free eggs, the WIC program must be able to provide these eggs to the recipients. This is because they are better for the farmed animals, the recipients and the retailers. However, the WIC program will have to adjust to the new retail market.

Several companies have made commitments to eliminate battery cages from their supply chains. One of these was Unilever, the world’s largest food company, which fulfilled its commitment to use only cage-free eggs by the end of 2016. Other large companies, like Walmart, McDonald’s, and General Mills, have also made commitments to phase out battery-cage eggs from their supply chains.